We are proud to be part of the faculty of the Master’s in Strategic Management of Digital Marketing, Business, and Artificial Intelligence at the Graduate School of the Faculty of Economic Sciences of the University of Buenos Aires (ENAP Económicas UBA).
The Federal Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals (Division II) upheld a resolution of the Argentine National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) that had rejected the opposition filed by Algabo S.A. against the registration of a design mark applied for by La Fármaco Argentina I.C.S.A.
The Federal Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals (Division II) upheld the Argentine National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) provision that declared unfounded the oppositions filed by the German multinational PUMA SE against the applications for registration of mixed trademark “EL PUMA (& Design)” (Classes 35 and 37) filed by an individual for an auto parts workshop and business.
The Federal Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals (Division II) upheld the resolution of the Argentine National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) that declared the nullity of a design mark registration.
The Federal Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals (Division II) upheld the Argentine National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) resolution that declared unfounded the opposition filed by Despegar against the application for the mixed trademark “VIVIR VIAJANDO (& Design)” in Class 39.
The Federal Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals (Division II), rejected the appeal filed by PepsiCo Inc. and upheld the resolution of the Argentine National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), which had declared its oppositions against Grupo Bimbo’s application to register “FRITOSTITOS” in classes 29 and 30 to be unfounded.
As we previously reported, through Resolution P-038/2026 (the “Resolution”) the Argentine National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) modified the procedure for registering technology transfer and technical assistance agreements covered by Law 22,426.
