• English
  • Español

Fintech

In September 2026, the Federal Civil and Commercial Court upheld a ruling by the Argentine National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI)  that had found merit in the oppositions filed by the Asociación Civil de Estudios Superiores (ACES), the founder of “Universidad Austral”, against the applications for mixed trademarks filed by Editorial Planeta S.A. that incorporated the word "AUSTRAL" as a central word element.
El próximo 27 de noviembre a las 9:00 h, Celia Lerman, socia fundadora de Lerman & Szlak, participará en el taller de ASIPI Chile “Impacto de la inteligencia artificial en la dinámica contractual”.
We are pleased to highlight the participation of our partner, Gabriela Szlak, as a speaker at #AILAT26, Latin America's most relevant AI and business event, which brought together over 4,000 attendees.
The Argentine National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), declared ex officio the nullity of the granting of the mixed trademark “STRANGE BREWING” (Application No. 4128618, class 43). The administrative decision was adopted after detecting a serious and incurable defect in the proceeding: the agency granted the registration without having previously published the application in the Argentine Trademark Bulletin.
Law No. 25,326, enacted in 2000, established a penalty regime empowering the enforcement authority (currently, the Access to Public Information Agency, or “AAIP”) to impose various types of penalties, including suspensions, fines, and the closure or cancellation of non-compliant databases.
We are proud to be part of the faculty of the Master’s in Strategic Management of Digital Marketing, Business, and Artificial Intelligence at the Graduate School of the Faculty of Economic Sciences of the University of Buenos Aires (ENAP Económicas UBA).
The Federal Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals (Division II) upheld a resolution of the Argentine National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) that had rejected the opposition filed by Algabo S.A. against the registration of a design mark applied for by La Fármaco Argentina I.C.S.A.
The Federal Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals (Division II) upheld the Argentine National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) provision that declared unfounded the oppositions filed by the German multinational PUMA SE against the applications for registration of mixed trademark “EL PUMA (& Design)” (Classes 35 and 37) filed by an individual for an auto parts workshop and business.
The Federal Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals (Division II) upheld the resolution of the Argentine National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) that declared the nullity of a design mark registration.
The Federal Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals (Division II)  upheld the Argentine National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) resolution that declared unfounded the opposition filed by Despegar against the application for the mixed trademark “VIVIR VIAJANDO (& Design)” in Class 39.